27
Oct

Regency Fashion Show

Regency Fashion Show

Lady B: Welcome, dear ones! Do come in and make yourselves at home! We have left the gentlemen at home today so we might take an afternoon to revel in our female fripperies. They don’t understand our preoccupation with looking well! I’m sure they’d prefer all women to go around naked, never mind that it is practically November. In any case, Ms. Foley has offered us a trunk show today of all the latest fashions. So help yourselves to a glass of champagne and chocolate-dipped strawberry, and sit back for our fashion show.

Gaelen: Good day, my august Ballroomarians. Fashionable creatures that you are, I thought you might enjoy some photos of Regency style clothing that I took at the Jane Austen Center in Bath and the Bath Costume Museum. Visitors are very fortunate that they let you take pictures at both places. Enjoy the show!


 

First, a nice ensemble of male formal-wear, pre-1810 because of the knee breeches. The lovely dark blue tailcoat is double breasted, and the patterned waistcoat coordinates. A nice fluffy sort of cravat (possible the Romantic style knot), and note also the way the sleeve ruffle of the white shirt drapes below the cuff of the coat sleeve. This display was in the Jane Austen Center, Bath….

 

 

 

 

 

 

This group is also from the Jane Austen Center in Bath. Shown (Left to Right) are: a woman’s day dress with lace shawl, typical day-wear for a male child, and a girl’s white muslin gown….

 

 

 

 

 

 

Next, two ladies of the earlier part of the Regency in white muslin ballgowns. Note the beautiful white-on-white embroidered trains, high waists, and the all-important accessory, the India/kashmir/Persian shawl artfully draped over each young beauty’s arm! Bath Costume Museum. They are tres elegantes….

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ladies’ Daywear. This mannequin is shown wearing a spencer (jacket) over a simple white day-dress. Note the fashionable plume on her bonnet and the reticule (purse) in coordinating colors hanging from her arm. Jane Austen Center, Bath….

 

 

 

 

 

More ladies’ daywear. These ladies are dressed for cooler weather in long-sleeved gowns in a heavier, patterened fabric:

(Left) A dress like the lady on the Left is wearing could work as half-mourning because it has a checked pattern with black in it. I was particularly delighted with this figure because if you look closely, she is wearing spectacles like a good Regency bluestocking heroine. You might not be able to see it in the less-than-great photo, but she also has a “tucker” or fichu tucked into the neckline of her gown for added warmth and modesty.

(Right ) The figure on the right is wearing a brown pelisse. (Not sure of the fabric here–it’s shiny, possibly a satin blend.) Note her small, wispy bonnet and oversized reticule. (She must carry everything but the kitchen sink around in her purse like I do.) Bath Costume Museum….

 

Any shoe girls out there? Regency ladies’ shoes. Check out the pair of “kid half boots” in the middle. These look pretty basic for daywear, but fancy versions in embroidered velvet or other rich fabrics could be worn with evening gowns. On either side of the half boots, the little shoes closely resembles ballet slippers. Slippers like these could be worn for day or evening….

 

Never enough shoes… More slippers. Note that the pair on the Left, of kid leather, are laced up with a ribbon. The middle ones look like dancing slippers to me, again probably of kid leather, but the pair on the right could be of satin. Bath Costume Museum.

 

 So there you have it!

Lady B: Don’t forget, my darlings, Lady Miranda held a Regency Project Runway here in August if you missed it. If you you had not yet joined us here at the Ballroom, you might like to review her wonderful prints of ugly Regency clothes, where we got to vote for the ugliest outfit. It was wonderfully snarky good fun that day, making fun of fashion disasters.
http://www.theballroomblog.com/2011/08/regency-project-runway-part-ii-lady-b-delivers-the-auf/

Gaelen: Also, if you do want more details on Regency clothes, you are welcome to visit the following links to articles on my website. The Lady’s Wardrobe: http://www.gaelenfoley.com/archives_history1.html  and The Gentleman’s Wardrobe: http://www.gaelenfoley.com/archives_history2.html. I wrote them a few years ago, but that’s the beautiful thing about Regency clothes. They never go out of style. *g*

<First stare! All the kick!>

Thank you, Albert.

[By the way, ladies, I'll be hosting the Saturday Salon, as well, and I'm planning on talking more about clothes and fashion as they are illustrated in the Regency-era movie, "Bright Star," which is about the life and romance of John Keats and his fashionable ladylove, Fannie Braun. If you have seen the movie, or are able to stream it instantly over the net and would like to discuss it with me, that would be awesome. (Netflix can stream it instantly. I'm sure it's available elsewhere if you use that sort of thing.) The costumes and sets are particularly fine. Just a heads up in advance if anyone else is able to see it Thurs, Fri or Sat night. ]

Here is a trailer for the movie:

 

But back to the subject at hand. I love looking at real clothes from the period. How do you think clothes like these would have made you feel if you were a Regency woman, or how might they have impacted your everyday movements? 

As a writer, I am always pondering how elements of historical settings interacted, like clothes picking up the smell of the hearthfire or the stiffness of a cravat against the man’s neck, or the thinness of those little shoes thru which you must have been so aware of cold winter floors in those big houses before the days of central heating. It makes the period come alive for me. 

Any of those sorts of images strike you? What does it make you think of?

Period movies give us a great chance to see how Regency clothes moved and looked and how they might have felt with people wearing them. Any memorable moments come to mind for you from Regency-era movies you’ve seen, where they did something cool with the clothes in the context of the historical world?

Off the top of my head, I think of the Emma movie with Gwyneth Paltrow and her so-cool archery gloves…

 

 

 

 

 

 Also the Keira Knightly Pride & Prejudice getting the hem of her walking dress all muddy on her long walks.

 

 

What do you imagine it would be like to spend a few days in the Regency time wearing Regency clothes? What would you want to experience? Or, lol, what would you want to avoid? I’m all ears.

 

 

Under gaelen, history


  1. Oct 27, 2011
    2:13 am
    Elizabeth

    I have Bright Star sitting on my DVR right now… I’ll have to watch it sometime soon.

    Lovely post though! I too have wondered about what it would really be like to wear those kind of clothes. For the women, the dresses actually look comfortable (as long as you don’t have to wear a corset :P ). I can’t say the same for the men though. A lot of their clothes seem very form fitting and the fact that they had to wear a long sleeve shirt, a vest, and coat just sounds horrible. I couldn’t imagine having to wear all those layers in the summer (even though England’s summer aren’t as harsh as the USA’s can be).

    As for shoes I’d probably want to wear kid boots most the time (unless I was going to a ball). Most the slippers do seem thin and I do hate having cold feet, lol.

    Overall though, I probably wouldn’t mind wearing regency dresses as long as I didn’t have to wear a corset. I hate wearing clothes that are too confining.

    Anyways though I’ve said quite a lot so I’ll leave with this;
    http://www.abitiantichi.it/collezione.html
    It’s a website showing a personal collect of antique clothing that dates back to the early 1700s to the 1930s. She even has some photos that date from 1860 to 1900 (http://www.abitiantichi.it/collezione/fotodepoca.html). The website is all in Italian, but it’s pretty easy to navigate through. :)

    It’s all in Italian, but the it’s easy to navigate through regardless.

    • Sabrina Darby
      Oct 27, 2011
      12:09 pm

      Ooh, thanks for the link, Elizabeth!

    • Gaelen Foley
      Oct 27, 2011
      12:10 pm

      ELIZABETH! WOW, WOW, WOOOWWWW! thank you so much for sharing that Italian treasure trove of fashion! It must be from the Milan fashion world, only 200 years ago or so. *g* How fabulous.

      You guys, go see those links!

      I might try copying and pasting some of the costume explanations into the Free Online Translator at http://www.worldlingo.com.

      Many thanks again for sharing that with us. Great stuff!


      • Oct 27, 2011
        3:19 pm
        Elizabeth

        Happy you both liked the website. The woman who owns the site has a deviantArt account too, but I can’t seem to find it. She’s posted pictures on it with her wearing some of the dresses that are still “strong” enough to wear. Speaking of deviantArt though, here is the link to the History Fashion Lovers’ gallery on there.
        http://historyfashionlovers.deviantart.com/gallery/1054288
        Lots of self made dresses (and other art work) by people.

        And oops! Didn’t mean to say the site was in Italian twice, lol.


  2. Oct 27, 2011
    8:40 am
    Beebs

    Hi Gaelen, great post.

    Some of the Regency fashions were gorgeous but it must have been very inconvenient to be unable to dress without help and to have wet, muddy hems every time it rained.

    I like the white dresses with the Kashmir shawls pictured here but I don’t think the ‘mourning’ dress looks very flattering, kinda shapeless really.

    I think the costumes for any of the BBC period dramas always have a very authentic feel to them and I loved the costumes Gwyneth Paltrow wore in ‘Emma’

    • Gaelen Foley
      Oct 27, 2011
      11:09 am

      Beebs, you bring up a good point about the rain! Add to the treachery of walking in mud those things called “pattens” that lifted the wearer above the mud. These were metal and I’m sure they must have felt a little like those bell-shaped toys from the 1970′s that kids used to walk on, with ropes attached to them! (Not that pattens had ropes. Ok, bad analogy.) But long dress, plus umbrella, plus pattens, wow I think I wo uld’ve soon landed on my butt. But surely some broadshouldered duke would come along to lift me up and take me someplace to get dry, hubba hubba. lol.


      • Oct 27, 2011
        11:19 am

        LOL! Maybe if the pattens had had ropes maybe they would have felt steadier on them. I would have just stayed home on rainy days … hmmm …. doubt it, I would have been like Lizzie and mucking through the mud regardless. Although, it seemed to pay off occasionally, remember how Marianne met Willoughby … now Greg Wise carried off those clothes much better than Hugh Grant did!

        • Gaelen Foley
          Oct 27, 2011
          11:21 am

          Yeah, I have to agree. That Willoughby was hot. *g*

          • Sabrina Darby
            Oct 27, 2011
            12:10 pm

            Willoughby. Sigh.


          • Oct 27, 2011
            1:54 pm
            Beebs

            Yay! Willoughby. (Hawt bad boy)

            Never even thought of the pattens Gaelen, think I’d fall down and wait for a passing Duke as well. LOL


  3. Oct 27, 2011
    9:59 am
    Lisa

    One of the main reasons I love period/Regency dramas is the costume! Loved the costumes in Emma in particular, and the 95 version of P&P.

    But I agree with Beebs. They may love lovely, but I have my doubts as to comfort and convinience, especially the corset thing. Especially since I am all about comfort and would go around in jeans and sweats all the time if I could!

    One thing I have noticed is now some actors have the knack of putting on historical costumes, and they inhabit the character completely, while some actors can’t quite pull it off because their movements, mannerisms etc still have a modern sensibility.

    • Gaelen Foley
      Oct 27, 2011
      11:14 am

      Lisa, how true! Especially the male actors–they’ve either got it or not when it comes to the historical settings. You make a good point. And Amen on the comfortable clothes! :)


    • Oct 27, 2011
      3:50 pm

      I’d put Orlando Bloom near the top of the historical actor lists — granted, he’s more the swashbuckling/sword-wielding type than a true dandy, but I’m glad he’s returning to his sword-bearing roots with ‘The Three Musketeers’, ‘The Hobbit’ (even if his character wasn’t in the book), etc. He’s quite pretty as a swordsman ;)

      • Gaelen Foley
        Oct 27, 2011
        4:29 pm

        I agree! We’re really excited to see the 3 Musketeers movie around here. *g*


      • Oct 28, 2011
        12:52 pm
        Lisa

        Totally swoon-worthy as Will Turner. ::Sigh::


  4. Oct 27, 2011
    10:12 am

    Hi Gaelen, lovely photos and all the fashions in the museums were beautiful. I suspect those of the lower classes weren’t quite so elegant or fashionable, did they show any of them? I love the clothes from this era, at least the women’s, the poor gentlemen were forced to wear what seemed rather restricting clothing. Maybe that’s why our heroes are always loosening something. : )
    I had my wedding dress handmade and styled it after this fashion. It looked very similar to the pic of the white dresses with Kashmir shawls except that it was silk with lace overlay and had long lace sleeves with silk-covered buttons. I loved it. Having worn that dress for a day, I understood the trial and tribulations of worrying about where the back of the dress was (it got stepped on a couple of times and closed in a door once). Since the front of the dress is normal length, it’s easy to forget the fabric trailing in the back. I would’ve been horrified had it not stopped raining before the ceremony.
    I love the clothes and probably wouldn’t mind wearing them (believe me, I’m not a dress kind of gal) if I could wear them without the stays and never in the rain. It’s just so feminine and I think very sexy. : ) Forgot about BRIGHT STAR, saw the preview at the movies once so just added it to my queue. I love Keats and period pieces so it should be lovely. Thanks for sharing your lovely pictures … I’ve got to get to England some day.

    • Gaelen Foley
      Oct 27, 2011
      11:19 am

      I’m sure you will get over there, Amy! Your wedding dress sounds absolutely beautiful. I did not see any real clothes for the lower classes, but I suspect that’s because they were worn until they were destroyed. I’m sure you know this, but lower class people could sell their old clothes to the ‘rag and bone’ men. They did hand-me-downs, too, you’ve probably heard how even the wealthy women could give their old gowns to their ladies’ maids. One of the perks of being a skilled lady’s maid.

      I’m glad you enjoyed the pictures! I think there are more clothes at the V&A but I only spent an hour in there. I need to get back to London, too.

      Gaelen

      • Miranda Neville
        Oct 27, 2011
        11:39 am

        Good point about lower class clothing. Those guys were really into recycling!


        • Oct 27, 2011
          11:57 am

          It’s probably true that most of the lower class clothing eventually ended up rags but I had hope that perhaps something had been found and rescued … considering all of the undergarments and layers of dress that the middle and upper class wore, it would be interesting to know exactly what the poorer classes had for apparel. The lucky ones were the household staff as you pointed out, Gaelen, they got ‘hand-me-downs’. Lady B, you were right to leave the men home this time … we CAN gab about fashion, can’t we? LOL!

        • Gaelen Foley
          Oct 27, 2011
          12:12 pm

          I’ll bet it passed from hand to hand, sibling to sibling on down for a few generations until it ended up with the rag and bone man, and ultimately burnt for fuel. “The Life of a Grubby Workdress”…an epic, to be sure. *g*


  5. Oct 27, 2011
    11:40 am
    Ruth

    The Bath Costume Museum is my favorite museum! It’s quite small, very focused on a particular period of history, very close to everything else in Bath, if I remember right, and can easily be followed up by a ridiculously decadent “tea” in the Pump Room…

    • Gaelen Foley
      Oct 27, 2011
      12:04 pm

      That’s right, Ruth! I also loved Bath. I have no sense of direction, but the Classical minds that laid the city out made it Very Simple for the directionally challenged to navigate. *g* UNLIKE LONDON. (Or my home city of Pittsburgh, for that matter.)


    • Oct 27, 2011
      12:38 pm
      cayenne

      I love the Bath Costume Museum. Its Georgian collection is excellent, and I really enjoy the scenarios they place the mannequins in.

      If you like museums & love shoes (because really…who doesn’t love shoes?), and happen to be in Toronto, I highly recommend this one. http://www.batashoemuseum.ca/

      One thing about historical costume in modern films: the dresses are not always constructed in period fashion. If you ever have the chance to look at the back of a Regency or William IV fashionable day dress, check out the sleeves: they often go to mid-back, meaning that the woman can’t lift her arms above elbow-height without ripping the sleeves out. Great for needlework or park-strolling, bad for actual, living movement. Modern designers don’t generally incorporate the truly restrictive fashion elements because the actors can’t work with them.

      • Gaelen Foley
        Oct 27, 2011
        12:55 pm

        Thank you for the link, Cayenne! Thanks also for pointing out the sleeve construction. I can’t even imagine having that limited movement. But I guess they just got used to it, shrug. :)


        • Oct 27, 2011
          1:05 pm
          cayenne

          And anyone who didn’t wore a riding habit, I guess. Most female costume was restrictive in some way – could a woman ride a horse in a massive bustle, a hoopskirt or 7′-wide square panniers? Or actually, y’know, breathe in a corset laced to 16″? Sleeves are mild in comparison.

          • Gaelen Foley
            Oct 27, 2011
            3:13 pm

            LOL. They probably would’ve killed to be allowed to wear cute yoga pants and a hoodie with sneakers for a day. lol.


  6. Oct 27, 2011
    11:41 am
    Ruth

    Oh, and the V&A costume exhibit is amazing, but a bit overwhelming IMO.

  7. Miranda Neville
    Oct 27, 2011
    11:43 am

    Lovely post, Gaelen. I can just imagine our heroes in that gentleman’s ensemble. The men’s clothing is one of the big reasons I love the Regency!

    The evening dresses with the trains are beautiful. Trains are so elegant but they must have been very tiresome to deal with. One hand would be permanently occupied holding it up whenever you wanted to move, let alone dance. In movies you sometimes see a train attached to a ladies’ wrist with a loop. I wonder if that was really how it was done.


  8. Oct 27, 2011
    11:53 am
    Gail Nichols

    I like these costumes better because they look comfortable. Those hoop dresses like the ones in “Gone With The Wind”look extremely painful.It makes me wonder what kind of physical hardships it would make on the body of older women of the era.

    • Gaelen Foley
      Oct 27, 2011
      12:05 pm

      That is a good point. And aint no-way-no-how this waist could ever get anywhere near Scarlett’s 18 inches. That’s just freaky!!!


      • Oct 27, 2011
        12:13 pm

        Yikes, NO! Those poor women used to have all kinds of internal problems not to mention back trouble. I suppose today you could have some ribs removed to make a smaller waist in a corset but not this gal! I’ve looked like a boy from behind all my life until I turn around and that’s the way it’s going to stay! : )


  9. Oct 27, 2011
    11:54 am

    Wonderful post, Gaelen! What beautiful pictures.

    I could totally go for Regency fashion. I think the Regency ladies had it pretty easy, compared to their Georgian and Victorian counterparts! The empire waist is so forgiving and the small sleeves allow lots of freedom of movement. And the Indian shawl is so much like today’s pashmina! For those worried about the corsets, I really think Regency stays were mostly half-corsets that weren’t much more restrictive than your average bra. Just supportive. :) They certainly couldn’t have been worse than spanx!

    But I do feel sorry for the laundresses and ladies maids who had to maintain those white gowns. What a challenge.

    I have been meaning to watch Bright Star! Now I have the perfect excuse. :)


    • Oct 27, 2011
      2:09 pm
      Beebs

      Can’t have been worse than Spanx LOL!

      Thank God for washing machines! I think I’d have to be wealthy enough to hire laundry maids if I ever went back to any pre-washing machine eras.


  10. Oct 27, 2011
    12:02 pm

    “They certainly couldn’t have been worse than spanx!”
    ROFL!!! Tessa, I saw a video once of a woman putting on her spanx … I laughed so hard I had to pee and then I thought about how in the world she was going to pee later in the day if she had to go through all that to get them on in the first place. Laughed even harder. Consequently, I don’t wear spanx!

    • Gaelen Foley
      Oct 27, 2011
      12:06 pm

      Amy, imho, the best place to review servant or lower class clothes are i nthe many drawings and cartoons of the period. Particularly the Pierce Egan/Cruikshank Tom & Jerry sketches. fwiw. :)


      • Oct 27, 2011
        12:10 pm

        LOL! Thanks Gaelen, I remember those and you’re probably right.


  11. Oct 27, 2011
    12:07 pm

    Fashions tend to repeat and I think this style has probably made a comeback more than any other, in different lengths and styling but basically the same. It’s attractive, feminine, obtainably comfortable minus restraints and looks good in all variety of lengths. Consider other eras from medieval to modern – shifts and A-line styles have been the basis for some of the most attractive fashions. Just saying. : )

  12. Sabrina Darby
    Oct 27, 2011
    12:13 pm

    Love looking at all the clothes! The champagne and strawberries remind me of shopping for my wedding dress. I’d watched so many old movies that I half-expected I would sit on a couch sipping my champagne or tea while models would parade in the dresses. Haha, not quite!


    • Oct 27, 2011
      12:17 pm

      Now that would definitely be the life, Sabrina … ahem, someone please refill my champagne and Lady B. may I bother you for some more strawberries, please. ; )

    • Gaelen Foley
      Oct 27, 2011
      12:17 pm

      That would be a nice way to start the day! How very “Pretty Woman.” *g*

  13. Gaelen Foley
    Oct 27, 2011
    12:17 pm

    I’ve heard that empire line gown originally came from Napoleon’s first wife, the Empress Josephine, as a maternity style because he was so concerned about having a son to carry on his empire. She was older, so there was concern about whether she was ever pregnant or going to become so, and that by wearing this style, no one could ever be sure if she was with child or not…thus it was easier to lie at those times when she wasn’t. (I don’t recall if she had had miscarriages by him, but I know he did not actually have a son till he married the second wife, the Habsburg princess).

    At any rate, whenever Josephine was thought to be with child, it helped keep the vultures at bay (politically, ie those who were eager to get what they could from any future succession after Napoleon if no son were produced).

    In any case, it is very interesting to me that we can walk into Macy’s or whatever today and buy empire line dresses and blouses. Regular or maternity, for that matter.
    :)


  14. Oct 27, 2011
    12:22 pm

    I imagine you could hide a multitude of sins beneath all that material, Gaelen, which is probably why all of Europe and GB jumped on that styling and eventually it even reached those backward Colonists. Remember that this was a time when ‘being with child’ was not discussed nor displayed in public. Women tended to go into confinement once they began to show. They didn’t generally attend social functions and certainly didn’t dance so it made sense that when a fashion came along that could generally hide their ‘state of indelicacy’ until the last months, they embraced it wholeheartedly.


  15. Oct 27, 2011
    12:58 pm

    Lovely photos, Gaelen! Thanks for sharing. I still grieve the change a few years back from the Costume Museum to the Fashion Museum. A lot less historical fashion on display these days. I’m planning to visit Bath in about 3 weeks and will definitely hit the Fashion Musuem, where there is currently an exhibit on wedding dresses.

    There was a fabulous exhibit there some years ago called “Jane Austen: Film and Fashion” in which they displayed costumes from most of the JA movies alongside real costumes of the period. As much as we may all love the look of the Gwyneth Paltrow EMMA, the curators disdained the costumes as Hollywoodish and inaccurate, especially the fabrics. As I recall, both the 1995 P&P (the one with Colin Firth) and the 1995 PERSUASION (with Amanda Root) were cited as having the most accurate costumes.

    • Gaelen Foley
      Oct 27, 2011
      3:18 pm

      Hi Candice! Thanks for dropping by! Glad you enjoyed the pictures. I wasn’t even aware they had changed the name of the museum! Sounds like it’s time for another visit to catch up.

      I don’t think I’ve ever seen the 1995 Persuasion. I’ll have to check that out. Have you seen Bright Star? I’d love to get your take on it. I daresay you’re more expert in the clothes than I am. I’m sure those curators know what they’re talking about, but who could even notice when Mr. Knightley (actor name? don’t know) was as cute as they come in that movie.

      I loved where he tells her not to shoot his dogs AND when he scolds her for being mean to Miss What’sHerName, the spinster lady.

      :)
      Gaelen


      • Oct 27, 2011
        5:19 pm

        Oh, Gaelen, you MUST see the 1995 Persuasion. In my humble opinion, it is the very best of the JA movies. And yes, despite the Bath curator’s disdain, I love watching Emma with the gorgeous Jeremy Northam as Mr. Knightley. Best Regency movie hero ever!

        I do love Bright Star. I think I’ve watched it 3 times, even though I really don’t like the actor who played Keats. But it is wonderfully atmospheric and the costumes appear do be spot on.

        • Sabrina Darby
          Oct 27, 2011
          5:29 pm

          The 1995 Persuasion is so good! Hmm, I wonder if it’s on Netflix download.

        • Miranda Neville
          Oct 27, 2011
          5:32 pm

          I agree on the 1995 Persuasion. Lovely movie. I think of the Emma as akin to the Oliver P&P. Not Jane Austen but who cares?

          • Gaelen Foley
            Oct 27, 2011
            7:21 pm

            Oh, goody, a new-to-me Jane movie to look forward to!

            Jeremy Northam! That’s his name. He is A. Dor. Able.

    • Gaelen Foley
      Oct 27, 2011
      3:19 pm

      By the way–have a wonderful trip!


  16. Oct 27, 2011
    3:56 pm

    I *adored* the Bath Costume Museum when I was there in 2008. I did Bath as a daytrip from London and promptly regretted it; there was so much of interest there for a Regency writer, particularly one with some Roman leanings (the baths are a must-see).

    I think I would love wearing Regency dresses; my standard attire is some form of empire-waist dress, although they’re usually shorter than I could have worn then. But I would have to be ‘fast’ and wear drawers — I can’t quite get over the idea of not having some form of unmentionables between me and the wind (or the attentions of a sexy duke, of course ;)


  17. Oct 27, 2011
    4:31 pm
    Barbara

    Just got back from England/Wales about 3 weeks ago. My daughter is going to graduate school in Bristol so we did a day tour of Bath. We were fortunate that 1 Crescent was having an exhibition of first edition Jane Austen books. My daughter was in raptures as Jane is her absolute favorite author! She has a set of all the books, twice over and all the movies on DVDs. I like going there to see the room decorations and the V&A also has some good stuff.
    The clothes are pretty but yet, I would feel very hampered by the long skirts, especially when I would go for a long walk or even shopping. I like my dresses and skirts above the knee and rarely wear pants to work. Also, I just can’t see doing my treadmill work in something like that. I can see why the occasional heroine wears pants-especially if fencing or riding a horse.
    The ones I do like are the ball gowns. They would be like wearing a wedding dress every night!
    If you want to see some real opulence, go on the tour of Cardiff Castle. The manor house is fabulous and for those you like medieval the keep certainly gives you an idea of what it was like to actually like in a castle.

    • Gaelen Foley
      Oct 27, 2011
      7:24 pm

      Hello, Barbara! Your trip sounds just wonderful. I have never been to Wales (yet!) but it’s funny you mention Cardiff Castle. My dh has just finished reading the Ken Follett novel, Fall of Giants, and he was fascinated by the parts that took place in Cardiff. So we must definitely visit that whole area next time we’re there. Any excuse to see a great castle, too! *g* Thanks for telling us about your trip. Sounds just lovely. :)
      Gaelen


  18. Oct 27, 2011
    4:44 pm

    Good Lord, that preview gave me chills. I have to see it. I do think about the clothes of the Regency period, not as much as I should though. So, thank you for the reminder! I loved the Knightly P&P, the way they all moved in their clothes. For some reason, the characters’ attire seemed much more real to me in that particular movie, more than any other I’d seen. Maybe because Elizabeth got wet, she got muddy, she dragged her hem -she didn’t always look perfect. Same with Sense and Sensibility, if I think of it.
    I do think that all that cloth, and a corset and stocking and garters, would impede movement and make everything twice as hard to accomplish. Still, it would be interesting to wear. This is a neat website: http://sensibility.com/
    She sells patterns, but also takes special orders. One day… :D

    • Gaelen Foley
      Oct 27, 2011
      7:27 pm

      Hi Olivia! Good points, all. I think you will love Bright Star because they gave the same sorts of effects with the clothing–real life sort of usage of the clothes. Fanny, the heroine, is not an aristocrat, either. She’s very down to earth, and almost has an entrepreneurial streak with her interest in fashion design. But that’s all I’ll say for now! Oh, and thanks for the link! I will check that out.
      :)
      Gaelen


  19. Oct 28, 2011
    8:37 am
    B

    I love the romanticism of the Regency period. The thing is, it does come with a price. While women of our period are frustrated with the dwindling numbers of true gentlemen (the Jane Austen material, mind you), we have (in my opinion) a great advantage when it comes to the subject of toilets. Yes, ladies, toilets. I love Regency clothing, but can you imagine yourself in a situation wherein your bladder’s about to burst and you have to hike up your skirts to take a leak? Flushing and toilet seats were yet to be invented…
    I think it’s pretty much like reading Romance novels and watching period movies: Do you see how the characters relieve themselves? ;)
    But you know what? I’d rather be stuck in the Regency Era. I love falling in love. It’s just the toilets…

    • Gaelen Foley
      Oct 28, 2011
      2:54 pm

      LOL B! That is so true. I’ve been to weddings where I had to be on bride ladies’ room visit duty, ie to hold the gown safely o ut of the way so bride (family memeber) could pee! lol those wedding day jitters are a reall problem when you’re in a bunch of foofy white skirts with train and veil. I”m sure many of you ladies know what i”m talking about! And that’s with a modern toilet. Well, that’s the beauty of writing and the movies. We can skip those parts entirely. *g*


  20. Nov 7, 2011
    1:01 am

    [...] bother me. The next time instead of writing a letter I’ll borrow one of those dresses from Gaelen’s fashion show, or I’ll ask Tessa if any of the Spindle Cove ladies’ have a gown they can spare for a day. [...]


  21. Apr 14, 2013
    1:47 pm
    Lionel Stremi

    A toilet seat riser makes settle the carriage of a significant number of individuals and makes heading off to the bathroom a partmore straightforward so it is not something that might as well be stayingaway from simply due to its look and association with maturity. I know that most folks don’t require a higher toilet seat at an adolescent experience but as you get more advanced in years it will end up being increasingly foremost to you.^

    Most recently released write-up coming from our very own blog
    <="http://caramoantourpackage.com

Leave a Reply

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.

The Next Set

Join us Mondays and Thursdays for the ball, and Saturdays for Lady B's Saturday Salon!

The Authors

Find Us

Twitter Facebook RSS Feed

Search

Categories

Tags

Archives

Links Out

Meta

Dance Card

Any Duchess Will Do

Tessa Dare
Coming May 28, 2013

Any Duchess Will Do

Let It Be Me

Kate Noble
Available now

Let It Be Me

The Ashford Affair

Lauren Willig
Available now

The Ashford Affair

How To Marry a Highlander

Katharine Ashe
Coming July 30, 2013

How To Marry a Highlander

One Good Earl Deserves A Lover

Sarah MacLean
Available now

One Good Earl Deserves a Lover

Entry-Level Mistress

Sabrina Darby
Available Now

Entry Level Mistress

The Importance of Being Wicked

Miranda Neville
Available now

Confessions from an Arranged Marriage