Feb
Saturday Salon: Celebrating 200 years of Pride and Prejudice
While dear Monty has held our attention for many weeks, an important milestone went slightly overlooked in the Ballroom. (Well, it had to be. We couldn’t leave Monty in the middle of that Argentinian dance floor, after all.) This past Monday, Jan. 28th 2013 was the 200th anniversary of the first publishing of the book that launched a thousand ‘ships, Pride and Prejudice.
I can imagine dear Aunt Jane, in a cottage in Chawton, clutching a newly bound copy of the 3 volumes of her second novel and squeeing. Or, whatever the 1813 version of squeeing was. Did she think the story of Elizabeth Bennet and Fitzwilliam Darcy would capture the imagination for over two centuries? Did she know that she put indelible characters to the page, and would enrapture millions (and spur a costume-theater industry that gave birth to the Great Wet Shirt Scene of 1995?)
We all know it. We’ve all read it. We’ve all watched it. (Some of us even work on adaptations of it.) But for each of us, the story is personal. I asked my fellow authoresses what Pride and Prejudice means to them.
Katharine Ashe:
Pride and Prejudice was the third adult romance I ever read, after M.M. Kaye’s The Far Pavilions and Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, and I adored Lizzy. Her intelligence, wit and rejection of society’s most noxious values helped forge my ideal of a great heroine. And Jane Austen’s writing is, of course, delicious. Whenever I am especially starved for wonderful, clever prose, I reread P&P and am nourished again.
Delicious prose certainly helps inspire us authors (and Katharine knows from delicious prose). Meanwhile, both Sarah and Sabrina seem to be obsessed with a certain scene (that isn’t actually in the book. At least, not so explicitly dishabilled).
Sarah MacLean:
Aside from allowing me my first taste of wet Colin Firth, Pride & Prejudice is one of the books that made me believe that romance was something worth celebrating. The first proposal remains one of the greatest moments in romance for sheer heroic stupidity, and the second for glorious, wonderful, reconciliation and finally finally getting happily ever after. I would be lying if I said I didn’t pay homage to both those scenes in my books (with stupid heroes and happily ever afters). Thank you, Aunt Jane, for the powerful lesson in love–and how to write it.
Sabrina Darby:
From Laurence Olivier and Greer Garson trading barbs over archery, to Colin Firth emerging wet from a pond, to a improv show in the middle of Hollywood, to the worst play adaptation I’ve ever seen, Pride & Prejudice‘s ability to entertain no matter how adulterated is a testament to Jane Austen’s storytelling abilities.
Somehow I missed the play adaptation! Even if it’s horrible, I think I need to see it. For reference. However, Miranda Neville and Lauren Willig started early in her Austen-obsession.
Miranda Neville:
I came to P&P sideways. I can’t remember how old I was – maybe 12? – when I found a ratty paperback of a dramatization in my grandmother’s attic. There were only three sisters (like the Lizzie Bennet Diaries!) but the story was all there. I was instantly hooked so Granny gave me the book. Surprise! Five sisters. After glomming the other five books I wept at the paucity of her output. I wrote an essay for university entrance on why I’d rather discover a new Jane Austen novel than her diary (arguing the opposite way for Shakespeare).
I don’t know how many times I’ve read P&P since then. (I may approach the 200 claimed by Meg Ryan in You’ve Got Mail.) I always seem to find something new. And boy, could Jane Austen write dialogue! She’s an inspiration to me in so many ways, but above all in the way she makes conversation carry the story. Time for a re-read
Lauren Willig:
It’s hard to remember a time when Jane Austen hasn’t been with me. But I do have a very vivid recollection, somewhere around fifth grade, of reading Pride and Prejudice for the first time. My father, seeing me with the book, asked me what I thought the setting was. “England,” I said. I was eleven. The “duh!” was implied. He started talking about class and hierarchy and the low gentry versus the high gentry and blah, blah, blah. I went back to Elizabeth and Darcy. Silly parents, couldn’t they see that it was a love story? In my righteous adolescent scorn, it took me a few years to realize that my father had been right, too: that there was brilliant social criticism woven into the fabric of Lizzy and Darcy’s love story. The story works on so many different levels, all of them seamlessly stitched together. Let’s raise a glass to Jane Austen, who showed us all just what romance literature can be.
While we find this story very close to our hearts, the hands down winner for Austen-phile is Tessa Dare. Here’s why:
Tessa Dare:
The hows and whys are a long and complicated story, and I won’t bore you with all the details, but the conclusion is simple: P&P is the entire reason I am a historical romance author today. What do I not owe that book?
In my high-school yearbook, I listed “Elizabeth Bennet” as the person I admired most. Yes, I was that *that* girl. It took Colin Firth to make me a true Darcy fan. But boy, did he ever. My son’s middle name is Austen. I have the Jane Austen action figure in my bathroom! (Do I win yet? Haha.)
Yes, Tessa. You win. As for me, I wasn’t quite as early to the Austen pond. I was 15 when I first read the book – it was assigned for English. Even though it’s language was heavy and seemingly ancient, I couldn’t stop reading. There was something about her voice. Then, when I was 16, I saw the 1995 Colin Firth version. I stayed up all night, watching all 6 hours. Then, I kept watching it, over and over and over (I had the box set) and over. It’s the story that made me dream of my own Mr. Darcy – and let me tell you, when I passed one-and-twenty and he hadn’t shown up yet, I was displeased. But most of all, it is a story that makes me aspire. Aspire to be a better writer, a more astute observer of life, and more willing to see my own flaws.
So we all raise a glass to you, Aunt Jane, and say congratulations –and happy 200th!
Like I said, we all know the story – so what does Pride and Prejudice mean to you?













Feb 2, 2013
9:59 am
My first taste of Jane was in the basement of my sister’s house. I was watching Masterpiece Theatre & they were playing P&P with David Rintoul & Elizabeth Garvie. I fell in love right there & had to learn more. I learned about Jane, herself & read some of the books – I confess to only skimming over Sense & Sensibility & P&P. I did watch all the movie versions. While S&S is still my fave, I do have a soft spot for P&P.
I love how Lizzie is like a modern woman in the time when women should have been like her sister, Jane – quiet & demure. You also gotta love that swimming in the lake – wet Darcy? Hello! I think Jane Austen would have loved that, herself. I like how Darcy is a flawed hero. Don’t we all love our heroes like that? That is probably why I am a Willoughby fan, but I digress, P&P has it all and that is why it survives today. Happy Birthday & may you celebrate many more!
Feb 2, 2013
12:25 pm
Jamie — we so often forget the Elizabeth Garvie version! (I have trouble watching it personally, because of the weird BBC rules at that time about video-indoors, film-outdoors, but I digress.)
Lizzie is quite modern. But it turns out that her wants and desires are actually quite timeless — mutual admiration and respect out of her marriage. Must be why its lasted so long.
Feb 2, 2013
2:23 pm
I think Elisabeth Garvie is my favorite film/tv Elizabeth, Jamie. I loved her!
Feb 2, 2013
11:21 am
Happy Anniversary P&P! Like many have said, it’s a testament to Jane Austen’s storytelling that the characters and themes are still relevant and resonate 200 years later.
I got introduced to JA and P&P my freshman year of high school. A friend of my mother’s lent me her VHS tapes of the 95 BBC version of P&P with Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle. Lizzie and Darcy captivated me from the start and I spent all weekend watching it. I will forever be grateful to her for introducing me to Jane and making me an Austen fan for life!
Pride and Prejudice has taught me how powerful subtle can be. A simple touch of the hand, a glance across the ballroom, a flirty smile, can be just as charged, romantic, and sexy, than a kiss of full on love scene. Maybe even more so.
It has also inspired me. Elizabeth Bennet is a heroine who did not settle. She refused a marriage to a man who merely provided safety and financial security. Instead, she held out and insisted on a marriaged based on love, trust, passion, and respect to someone she genuinely cared for, admired, and who treated her as an equal. And she got it. May we all be as strong as Lizzie and demand nothing less.
Feb 2, 2013
12:27 pm
Too true Lisa — and I love what you say here, “the power of subtle.” Too many people forget that a glance can speak more about a person’s feelings than any drunken makeout session.
(and it was sophomore year for me
)
Feb 2, 2013
2:24 pm
“May we all be as strong as Lizzie and demand nothing less.” Hurrah, Lisa! Agreed!
Feb 2, 2013
1:32 pm
The first time I came across Pride and Prejudice properly was when I watched the 2005 film version with Keira Knightley. I was hooked instantly!
I’ve watched every film and tv version I can find, and read the book numerous times. I think watching Pride and Prejudice helped to cement my love of historical romances. I was already a loyal romance reader, but Pride and Prejudice gave me the push I needed to fall in love with historical romance books and I haven’t looked back since!
Feb 2, 2013
2:26 pm
Cerian, I adore that film version of P&P. It visually mingles the tone of the Brontes’ novels with the content of Austen’s, which equals perfect in my book. I think KK is a dreadful actress usually, but I really love her in this role as well as the other actors and actresses in the cast.
Feb 3, 2013
1:21 am
I love the 2005 version — and I expected not to. I was a 1995 version purist. Imagine my surprise when I went back to the theater 5 times to watch it.
Feb 3, 2013
1:26 am
Me too.
Feb 2, 2013
2:26 pm
Happy P&P anniversary, Kate!
Feb 3, 2013
1:22 am
Happy anniversary to you Katharine!
Feb 2, 2013
7:15 pm
Hi Ladies! Congrats to Ms. Jane for 200 years of brilliance continues!
I was first introduced to P & P at the same time as I was introduced to Wuthering Heights – same course, freshman year in college. I loved both but whereas WH was dark, gritty, and left me wanting for a happy ending, P & P was lightness, intelligent, filled with characters who made me wish to climb inside the book and gave me a happy ending that I wanted to continue. I was sorely disappointed to discover there was no sequel. I’d already read Mansfield Park and Northanger Abbey but was knocked down by the complexity of the plot and the characters in P & P, it was then I became a true fan! Happily went on to read the rest, but when the BBC adaptation starring Colin came along – I was in love!
I think if Ms Jane is watching, she is quite pleased. : )
Feb 3, 2013
1:23 am
They are deeply complex characters, aren’t they? Incongruous to each other, yet perfectly aligned, once they have all the information in hand — you do want to live inside this world!
Feb 3, 2013
1:27 am
I remember the day I wore a t-shirt with a picture of Jane Austen on it to school and my physics teacher asked who she was. My estimation of him went way down that day.